Photo: Susannah Parsons

Sneaky advertising, favorable reporters and native advertising: RTL knows all the tricks of the advertising business

Every day, incidents occur on the most visited site in Luxembourg, that of rtl.lu, which should cause quite a stir. One cannot be sure whether what one is reading is now already paid advertising or still journalistic content. The Press Code is unambiguous when it comes to instructions on how to separate journalistic content from advertising. Clear identification should prevent any kind of confusion. This is what the text says:

Art. 11 Commercial and financial information a) Advertising must be presented in such a way that the public cannot confuse it with editorial content. Advertisements and commercials that risk being misinterpreted by a moderately attentive and informed public as journalistic information must be clearly identified in order to avoid any confusion.

RTL1 took a randomly selected moment as an example and is now analyzing all the content here, as it was shown on rtl.lu on December 20, 2023 at 10:30 p.m. RTL.lu is, of course, a site that is co-financed by the state, works for staff who partly have press cards from the Press Council and is in direct competition with other press sites (which are too stupid to sue RTL).

Marked and hidden advertisements, what was found?